Open Menu Close Menu Apple Shopping Bag Apple Mac iPad iPhone Watch TV Music Support Search apple. com Shopping Bag.

Overview Music Video Charts. Iniciando iTunes Store. Si iTunes no se inicia, haz clic en el icono de la aplicación iTunes en el Dock de Mac o en el escritorio de Windows.

Progress Indicator. Abriendo Apple Books. Si Apple Books no abre, haz clic en la app Libros en el Dock. Haz clic en Ya tengo iTunes, para que sea activado. Mortal Kombat Blackbird! Give it a chance, you wont regret!

Counterplay Games, developer of Duelyst, manages to pick up players from competing games easily by offering similar accessibility, means of progression and game modes that made Hearthstone so successful.

If you are looking for a deep and unique card game that has a bright future, look no further. Duelyst might require more persistence and concentration than other similar games, but will engross you if you grew tired of trends in modern card games.

Duelyst overlaps enough with similar games in the genre that stepping into it doesn't feel like starting from scratch, but it still manages to distinguish itself with some clever additions.

While it still has its faults, those faults never overpowered the satisfying feeling of executing a perfect play. Even if you're still devoted to your competitive card game of choice, Duelyst is definitely worth a look. Duelyst felt more like a board game than a computer game with plenty of options and strategy.

Digitally Downloaded. Seeing as the game is free to play however, if you have any interest in the genre at all, there is no reason not to give Duelyst a try and see if its distinctive stylings suit you or not. See All 15 Critic Reviews.

After many hours you keep making strategical mistakes. You don't feel at all like it's impossible to build your collection over time without spending a dollar.

However if you're the typical "I want it all fast to get to tier S that's going to cost you a few orb packs. If you like strategic board games and CCG, and don't have very long periods of time to spend gaming, this game is really really good.

Trust me! Go download it and try it. Yknow that board game Han Solo and Chewbakka have on the Millenium Falcon? It's basically that.

Two players start with their generals the prime peice, like the king in chess already spawned on the board, as well as 2 or 3 mana in a power bar of 9 total. Summoning Minions and Casting Spells costs mana. You pretty much play as your general: each one has a different primary spell A 'Bloodborn Spell' and can cast other spell cards plus equipt items artifacts to make them more powerful or cast an effect.

As you play you'll notice when you play a card to do anything, your general does a little move to represent it.

As a general, you also spawn 'Minions' which are basically the pawns of the game. They cost mana to summon, usually have 'exhaustion' meaning they can't move or attack on the same turn as being summoned , and can have various effects which are activated various ways, E.

The game has Six factions, each with multiple generals. Each faction has also unique spells, artifacts and minions specific to their play style. Decks are all faction specific, meaning you cannot mix faction cards. However, there are a large amount of "faction nuetral" cards.

Cons: -Cash shop items: 'Orbs' are how players expand their library of cards. They can be bought with igc gold OR good ol' USD. You need to figure out how to use everything you're given to defeat the enemy general in one turn.

Daily Challenges can be completed for a measly 5 gold. It's not the only way to aquire gold, but it feels a lot like they aren't worth the reward, even if the community has an effort going to tell everyone how to solve them daily.

This means that if two generals just slugged it out, they would both die on the same attack and the match would draw. So, both sides use spells and minions to prevent damage to themselves. However: SomeFactions natrually excel at this while others just do not This could easily avoid being a con by rating the factions by playstyle difficulty, however at this point they aren't This means you'll see less variety in who you battle in PVP, faction wise.

Players could pre-order the orbs for a discount as pre-orders tend to go. Then players learned that the drop rates of different rarities of cards were nerfed compared to normal orbs, and are displeased that the different rate wasn't outlined in patch notes. CounterPlay The Developers had the opportunity to tell the players about it in a stream but chose to 'leave it discoverable', further displeasing the players.

They really have a chance to make amends as of this writing, they could JUST SIMPLY apologize to the players and never repeat what they did, but only time will tell how their reputation goes. I was extremely impressed at first, but my enthusiasm died within a few hours of play.

Basically it's just "Hearthstone Tactics" with even fewer options on how to play each hero, or, race. It could have been awesome if it had more options for single-player to make up for how much they want you to spend money on micro-transactions.

I don't have a problem with micro-transactions if the game is really fun. I understand everything in the world takes money to create. I just don't think this is worth it. Y se sigue explotando el género, hasta sacarle el último centavo a la gente Otra razón que me lleva a entender que esta clase de juegos, en la actualidad, se ha convertido en unos descarados pay to fast disfrazados de hermosos free to play.

Progresos muy lentos, sistema de comandos muy complicado, más tedioso en vez de tener un poco más de acción en tiempo real, desbalanceo a la hora de jugar con otra persona. Si hay una cosa que los creadores de juegos, y compañías hacen mal, es hacerle sentir al jugador que está perdiendo el tiempo.

Ni siquiera el modo práctica era tan tedioso como aquí. Si de verdad quisiera jugarme el dinero o la vida, prefiero que me asalten a mano armada en la vía pública. Al menos esa persona es sincera. No se dejen llevar por las estéticas, para qué existen las puntuaciones en Steam?

Se aprende mucho de los "no recomendados", aunque sean de títulos gratuitos. Y ahora saltará el gilipollas de turno con su "pero es que estos juegos tienen que vivir de algo" Se entiende, pero al punto de hacerte sentir que se te va la vida para subir de nivel, o tratando de entender las mecánicas?

O soy yo que le gusta mucho ir a piñón, o son estos juegos que te obligan a romperte la cabeza con estrategias sin gracia. No se descarguen este juego, y antes de hacerlo, vean las puntuaciones. Los "no recomendados" siempre sacan defectos. And it continues to exploit the genre, to get the last dime to people Another reason that leads me to understand that this kind of games, at present, has become a cheeky pay to fast disguised as beautiful free to play.

Very slow progress, very complicated command system, more tedious instead of having a little more action in real time, imbalance when playing with another person. If there is one thing that the creators of games, and companies do wrong, is to make the player feel that he is wasting his time.

Not even the practical way was as tedious as here. At least that person is sincere. Do not get carried away by aesthetics, what are the scores on Steam? You learn a lot from the "not recommended", even if they are free titles.

It is understood, but to the point of making you feel that your life is going to level up, or trying to understand the mechanics? Or is it me that likes to go in plan "come I'll give you", or are these games that force you to break your head with strategies without grace.

Do not download this game, and before doing so, see the scores. The "not recommended" always draw defects. This game is free to play on steam, however it is yet another pay to win collectable card game.

This game is extremely unbalanced to the point that is is unplayable. You do not even need any strategic skills to beat your opponent all you need to do is go to the shop and buy the best cards.

If you are not willing to pay for good cards, then there is no point in even wasting your time trying to play this game. See All 14 User Reviews.

You know; the one where you move your army through battles. But no! Press here, build that, click on this, rebuild another thing Where the heck is the game play? This game could be great if they cut back on the story line and you actually PLAYED the game, but wait not a ton of ads. That gets two stars.

Now click that, press here, build here, etc. The entire game changed and became a different game after the first fifteen minutes. Perhaps I was not patient enough to see if the gameplay would go back to what I signed up for but the ads made it seem like it would be a fun, simple math war game where you directed your troops into the math factors that increased your troop size the most.

Instead, it became a point and click game very quickly, which is not what I downloaded it for. It became a different game entirely. We apologize for any confusion caused.

We understand your disappointment with the change in gameplay. We appreciate your feedback and will take it into consideration for future updates. If I could give this zero stars I would. Buggy, frustrating, completely transparent monetization schemes.

Sit through two ads for in-game purchases every time you launch. Gameplay not only encourages attacking other players at random, but rewards the attacker even when there is a huge power disparity, or when the attacker loses.

Without spending money, joining a clan, or attacking other players, it is basically impossible to progress. The puzzle gameplay advertised is mostly nonexistent. We're sorry to hear about your experience with Total Battle: War Strategy.

We understand your frustration with the game's monetization and the imbalance in gameplay. We continuously strive to improve our game, and we'll take your feedback into consideration to provide a better experience for our players. Bug fixes and stability improvements. We would be happy to hear your feedback and suggestions.

Please send them to support totalbattle. flag Flag as inappropriate. public Website. email Support email. place Address. shield Privacy Policy. Evony: The King's Return. Rise of Castles: Ice and Fire. Lords Mobile Godzilla Kong War. March of Empires: War Games.

Vikings: War of Clans. War and Order. You want to have a modest number of early settles and a ton of them later. How other strategies work as a secondary boost to it: Development: Discounts can lead to cheap military boosting cards and scoring 6 buildings.

Trade: Combines very well, you can settle, then trade the good you get for many cards, both allowing you to find big scoring worlds, and afford the big developments. Production: Doesn’t combine well for scoring, since there are almost no military production worlds, and normal worlds aren’t utilizing your military.

However, it can get you good card income to get a world and consume power that provide cards. You’ll generally only develop a leech on other’s production.

Capitulo 2. Cards that make it strong: Deficit Spending and Merchant world are amazing, as without them this strategy tends to waste many cards through hand-limit discards.

Trade bonuses, especially large bonuses to a certain good that you can produce, are very helpful. Trade League and New Economy tend to do very well here, along with some other 6’s.

Contact Specialist is also good in this strategy, allowing more cheap windfall worlds to give you trade goods, as well as providing more opportunities to get big scoring worlds in the rebel worlds. How to play it well: Create a setup where you can trade multiple times per production cycle. This means that you want to have at least 2 more production capacity than you have consume powers, so that after a production you can trade and still have a good left to trade again on the next turn.

Another good way to go is to alternate between trading and spending your cards on big stuff, waiting for opponents to produce. How other strategies work as a secondary boost to it: Development: Putting together a combination of developments and worlds with trade powers and consumer powers, and 6 buildings like Trade League, New Economy, and Galactic Federation is incredibly strong.

However, develop discounts probably wont be very important when you are trading for a full hand each turn, you’ll just discard cards. Military: Generates more windfall worlds for you to sell, and the military worlds Production: An early trade strategy can often morph into a production strategy by getting consume powers and switching to 2xVPs.

Also a Trade League will allow you to make both a trade and choose 2xVPs. Capitulo 3. Production Strategy: You make worlds which produce goods, and some consume powers, and then alternate between producing and choosing Consume: 2xVPs.

Cards that make it strong: ‘Engine’ cards that consume multiple goods and possibly provide other advantages are a very efficient way to get a consumption strategy going. Consumer Markets, Diversified Economy, and Mining Conglomerate all consume multiple goods of certain type and produce cards.

Tourist World and Galactic Trendsetters consume goods for bonus VPs over what you usually get. Cheap Production worlds, and Replicant Robots will help you be able to afford to get going quickly. Many 6 developments such as Merchant World, Free-Trade Association, Mining League, Galactic renaissance, Seti, New Economy, and Tradue League support a production strategy.

How to play it well: Get your production set up quickly, not missing settle opportunities. If you get set up first, you can run your engine and gain a lead over the others.

Do it. For example, a Comet Zone, Mining World, and Mining Conglomerate are far, far better than a couple Prosperous Worlds. A quick setup like this can win, but you need to race the VP pile and hope the game ends before others can catch up to your early lead.

If you do make cards during your cycle, then you can score almost as many points during develop and settle as your opponents, making it very hard to overcome your gain from the production cycle. Making one windfall world is good, it lets you use your production phase bonus, and gives you an early trade.

Making two windfall worlds is bad unless you got something that produces onto one of them. How other strategies work as a secondary boost to it: Development: Many developments have useful consume powers, and many 6 buildings score well for a production strategy.

Military: Military isn’t really helpful to a primarily production strategy. Trade: You’ll often trade early on in a Production strategy, so trade bonuses are good early, but not late.

While production is a good second to a trading strategy, trading bonuses don’t really help a consume strategy later on. Trade League, however, is very strong.

Trade: strong. Production: ok. Military : Development: ok. Production: bad. Trade : Development: ok. Military: strong. Production : Development: ok. Military: bad. Trading for income supports all strategies well and keeps your options open. To use trading as more than a support strategy, you should get deficit spending or merchant worlds, and get a set up where you can consume more than once per production cycle.

It should prioritize cards that both make cards and produce or consume. It should not be combined with military.

They can either support a development strategy or help out any of the other strategies. Military strategies are much more concerned with hoarding strong future plays than any of the others.

A military strategy should only choose settle a moderate amount of times early on to limit opponent’s production setup , and should work on trading, exploring, and building up a hand of high scoring cards to play in the future. Like a trade strategy, and unlike a production strategy, settling a bunch of windfall worlds is fine.

Hand Management, by strategy Hand management is different for the different strategies. Development Strategy: Generally you won’t have many hand issues, since stuff is very cheap for you.

You should hold 6 cost developments that might be of use to you, but almost anything else is discardable. When discarding, try to maintain versatility in the cards you have left, such as keeping a development, and worlds that are different from each other, to react to different situations.

You don’t need to stockpile future plays very much, basically just 6 buildings. Military Strategy: You must stockpile future plays, or you’ll find yourself without ways to score later on. Don’t discard your big scorers while setting up your military, or you’ll be screwed.

It’s better to wait and get more cards, and then create your setup, with those military cards remaining in your hand. Throwing away extra little military windfall worlds is fine. Don’t throw away the big scorers.

If your hand fills with these you wont be able to build anything. It can definitely be worth it to trade a big good and go from say, 7 cards to 12, losing a couple cards in the discard, if it allows you to then play your 6 building without losing your big military scoring worlds.

If you have a number of military worlds in your hand, don’t be afraid to treat the small ones as money. Trading Strategy: You care the least about holding future plays of any strategy. You generate a ton of cards, so you’ll probably get something to play later. Try to keep playing big scoring cards whenever you can, to get your handsize back down, and avoid discarding.

For example, Terraformed World, Alien windfall worlds, and big Rebel worlds if you have contact specialist, are really good for this strategy, start trying to get them down midgame. This will lower your handsize so you can take full advantage of your next trade, and gets the points onto your board.

Deficit Spending or Merchant World is the exception. Production strategy: You care a moderate amount about stockpiling future moves, since you want to hold onto 6’s that help you, your engine card until you get one into play , and production worlds.

If you need to discard good future plays to get out an important world, or your engine card, do it. But it might be better to explore and hope someone else picks the develop or settle, so you can hold onto some future cards. More cards work for your strategy than any other, so if you discard stuff you want to make something that will generate cards, its ok.

Capitulo 4. General Hand Management: When discarding cards to pay for something, if you’re going to have a number of cards left over, be careful to keep versatile cards.

For example, if you’re doing a production strategy, and you have several production worlds and a couple developments in your hand, don’t just discard all the developments to pay for something.

You probably don’t need all those production worlds, and it’s more helpful to keep a development that you might want instead. When you’re able to keep a lot of cards after paying for something, there are some cards that are generally good to hold onto beyond the cards you know you want to make as future plays when choosing what to discard, due to their versatility.

These are very cheap and thus easy to play when an opponent develops, and you don’t have anything else to do. They are pretty universally helpful. Or with the colony ship, you could choose settle, desperate to get a certain expensive world down, and hope an opponent develops, allow you to get it cheaper using the ship.

They can be a nice way to upgrade your play in the settle phase, if a develop also happened. Contact Specialist: Contact Specialist is very cheap, and is kindof like the better version of new military tactics, to the non-military player.

It has broad uses, from getting very cheap windfalls, to buying big scoring rebel worlds, to scoring with Pan-Galactic League. Very cheap production worlds: Lets you do something on that settle, and get a cheap leech.

Gives you more ways to convert cards to points. These are especially good for a development or trading strategy that gets lots of cards and doesn’t have enough ways to spend them. Keeping different, versatile cards, and cards in different price ranges, can help you to more often be able to take advantage of the roles your opponents choose.

It’s a good idea to maintain possible plays, especially cheap but useful plays, Leeching: You want to make the roles that your opponents are picking benefit you as well. Doing so limits their ability to make a gain over you, A Leech is abilities that work for some phase that isn’t a phase you are primarily choosing for your strategy, but while opponents are choosing for theirs.

Bank is the best leech. Settle: Replicant Robots, Terraforming Robots, Contact Specialist, Small military for making free windfall worlds. Replicant Robots is an Extremely strong settler phase leech.

Also, a consume power when youre doing a military strategy with lots of windfalls. When developing a leech, do NOT make it in an area that no opponent is using as their main strategy! Thus: Do not build midgame development discount buildings if no one is doing a development discount strategy!

Do not build stuff like Replicant robots, or military, if no one else is going military unless youre planning to settle constantly yourself.

Leeching and hand management will allow you to make use of the roles your opponents choose, so that you limit their ability to gain on you.

The other role: Explore There are many effects of choosing Explore. The obvious one is getting more cards so that you can afford to build your stuff or afford to build it without discarding something critical.

It also improves everyone’s potential plays by giving them more options. This means that if a lot of exploring is happening, it is more critical to make sure the builds you make are strong ones, instead of just ‘anything helpful’. Because the phases that let you build aren’t happening as much, people cant get their strategies set up as fast, so it makes the opening phase of the game longer.

Early on, if you are thinking about choosing develop or settle, to make something that doesn’t have a strong impact on the game, its probably better to explore. Develop or settle when you know the thing you are doing is good, and thus will set you up with a better position than your opponents.

For example: Do NOT settle to build a random blue or brown non-military windfall world, or small production world as your first production world.

Doing so will often just allow an opponent to make a better windfall or production world, and possibly even trade a windfall that turn! Save that cheap play for a time your opponent picks it and you cant afford something better. You’ll probably help someone else do something better.

Development discount buildings on the other hand are great…and with them you plan to develop repeatedly while your opponents can utilize all the develops.

Save that cheap thing to use as a play for when your opponent picks it. If you DO have a strong early play, like a development discount card, an alien or gene windfall world, or production capacity when your opponents don’t have it, build or use that! Don’t explore and let your opponents find something strong also.

Early income. Helps with hand management, to afford something and keep future plays. You need to use it. Lets say that at the beginning of the game, you build a strong windfall world and traded, while your opponents built less useful things.

Don’t choose Develop or Settle to make some relatively minor, cheap thing, that helps you a small amount! Instead, keep working on pushing forward your main strategy and getting money, and save that play for a time when an opponent chooses that role, so you’ll have something beneficial to play then!

Another example: Lets say that early on in a game you have a good in play, and in your hand you have a trade bonus like export duties, or a world that gives a bonus to that color. You opponents don’t have production capacity.

Capitulo 5. Another example: You make an Investment Credits on turn 1, and there was no settle phase. In your hand you have a helpful development say an Interstellar Bank, or a Military development with a military world it can conquer in your hand.

You also have a decent windfall or production world in your hand that you want to make. Develop, don’t Settle! Developing presses your advantage, and your opponents probably cant use a second develop. Settling lets your opponents play something potentially strong, and then start using other phases more effectively than you.

When your tableau’s capacity is stronger than your opponents, USE IT, don’t just settle or develop more and let them potentially catch up. If you don’t have anything strong to build in your hand or can’t afford it , explore. Do not develop or settle a lesser card that doesn’t help you enough.

Try to get a strong play, or else your opponents will gain on you in board position. And when it is best for you, do it.

If produce helps say, you and one other opponent out of 4 a lot, and doesn’t help the others, still probably do it. For Consume, the advantage is several cards for Trade, or later several VPs with 2xVPs. The result is that it’s better for you to Consume, and have someone else pick the other role you want, than anything else.

This can make it a good strategy to choose Trade, hoping an opponent will settle and you can play a windfall world, if you have good reason to believe someone will settle. It also means you need to be extra wary of early settles that aren’t very beneficial to you, as it could allow an opponent’s trade that turn.

Past the beginning of the game, the main benefit of a role choice is making the role happen that helps you more than others. You should look at which strategies your opponents are pursuing, and then plan to not or almost never choose the roles that are for their strategy and not yours.